Hi Marcelo! "Marcelo E. Magallon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Jul 26, 1999 at 07:21:19PM -0400, Camm Maguire wrote: > > > Please also take a look at the package division/control stuff. I > > really haven't tbhough this through completely yet, but just attempted > > something quick to fit Debian policy. I'm sure we'll get rid of > > mpi-runtime and mpi-dev virtual packages. > > Yipee!!! I was working on updating your 6.1 package to 6.2; I was about to > write you about it, in particular about the shared libraries thing. lam is > nightmarish to package... > Agreed! There's got to be an easier way... > Camm, what are the names of the packages? I'd like to pull them out of > incoming, if the current Incoming lag persists, the new packages are going > to stay there for a while. Hmmm, now that I think about it... the .diff.gz > and .dsc files should be enough... you did upload them to master, didn't > you? > They're in Incoming/lam1_6.2b-pl3...deb, lam1-dev_6.2b-pl3...deb, and lam1-runtime_6.2b-pl3...deb. All source/diff/dsc is there too. > (BTW, IMO, you should upload a new 6.1 to slink-proposed-updates, the > current ones are unusable because of that hardcoded path bug) > Ah, sorry! I didn't notice. Does one simply put slink-proposed-updates in the distribution field of the control file? > I guess I can go back to fighting with mosix... > > Cheers, > > Marcelo BTW, 1) How are you thinking of doing MOSIX? 2) Is anyone interested in BSPlib? Take care! -- Camm Maguire [EMAIL PROTECTED] ========================================================================== "The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah
