[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Junichi Uekawa) wrote: > I think you can actually try playing around with update-alternatives. > > You could build-depend on mpich and lam, and build two versions > playing around with update-alternatives. (theoretically) > Not that I've tried.
Hmm ... In my opinion, if you're going to provide libraries built using two different MPI implementations, then you should name the libraries appropriately, so that the user knows which implementation is being used. Therefore, I don't think that alternatives are necessary or are particularly desirable. Just my 2 cents... - Brian
