Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Previously Viral wrote: > > For the time being I defined it to be 1024 (hoping thats large and safe) but > > whats the deal with NR_TASKS in 2.4.4 ? > > There is no NR_TASKS anymore, programs should just deal with the possibility > of an unlimited number of processes.
And user-level shouldn't have used it anyway because running a kernel
with a higher NR_TASKS required recompiling top.
Sven
--
Sven Rudolph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.sax.de/~sr1/
