On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 01:16:30AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > you are welcome to use arbitrary fields in debian/upstream; I chose YAML as > the > syntax in order to make this easy. > > However, I would recommend to aim at a simple structure: one field per ID, > instead > of a mapping (hash) of IDs.
Not yet fluent in the language at this end. Are you saying that: Also-Known-As: NeuroLex: someid NITRC: some other id should rather be NeuroLex-ID: someid NITRC-ID: some other id ? If that is the case, I'd like to have some reasoning what advantages this would have. Currently, I can only see that disadvantage that the logical/semantic grouping of fields with similar purpose is lost. After all we do: Reference: Author: ... ... as well. Thanks for the anticipated enlightenment ;-) Michael -- Michael Hanke http://mih.voxindeserto.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130102122527.GB24417@meiner
