On Wed, 27 Mar 2013, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > Just throw your perspective text against the mailing list, we will > > > be here to help refine it
> If anybody wants to make refinements - this > > https://wiki.debian.org/SummerOfCode2013/Projects#Redesign_metapackage_creation_for_Debian_Blends > is now the right place to go. to me the goal is not quite clear. First you push into a direction of using debtags, but because (as we discussed at some point I believe) the tag-set is quite limited ATM we cannot really use it ATM and it would require more of discussion/coordination with debtags people to make it useful for our purposes, than of any actual software development. Then you describe "The task of the GSoC project is to rewrite the blends-dev code to enable architecture dependent metapackages." which is a clear statement but has nothing to do with tags ;) So if it is just about architecture dependent packages -- drop debtags from description, may be? or discuss with debtags people (Enrico?) first on possibility of formalizing/extending debtags space to cover blends/tasks ? -- Yaroslav O. Halchenko http://neuro.debian.net http://www.pymvpa.org http://www.fail2ban.org Senior Research Associate, Psychological and Brain Sciences Dept. Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hall, Hinman Box 6207, Hanover, NH 03755 Phone: +1 (603) 646-9834 Fax: +1 (603) 646-1419 WWW: http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
