Hi, On Mittwoch, 24. April 2013, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > All sets of metapackages for Blends targeting at Wheezy arrived in > > > testing: > > > debian-edu: 1.702 > Currently 1.702 *is* in testing and as far as I have understood release > team they do not like any further unblocks.
drawing conclusions from something is sometimes difficult and might lead to
wrong results: the fact there isnt an unblock request doesnt mean we think
thats the most suitable version.
(and I do know about unblock requests and other working tools and procedures
of the release team.)
> > But then, I also uploaded debian-edu 1.704 last night, which IMO would be
> > far better suited for wheezy... (it needs a few other updates too).
> So please make sure you will discuss this with release team *right now*.
> We do have *ten* days until the announced release - so even if testing
> would not be frozen the normal migration process from unstable to
> testing would be really dense.
the changes are not suitable according to their policy, so discussing is a
bit, aeh, difficult. (been there, done that, though. ie for the squeeze
release...)
but, way more importantly: the changes are not enough yet, so it doesnt really
matter wheather 1.702 or 1.704 are in wheezy, we really want the (currently
non-existing 1.705 or 1.706), so why bother with 1.704.
And thats why the above statement is somewhat wrong. (Which is fine, I do
wrong statements all the time.) Glad that I understand the intention of your
original mail.
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
