Hello Andreas
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Andreas Tille <[email protected]> wrote: > Hmm, nothing in my inbox... > > Weird I will check it up again. I will make some commits again today I'll check again. > Hmmm, it certainly does what it should do but I might like to stress > that this is actually no *fix*. Yeap a wrong name convention, I had no other ideas of how to name the second script (fix was the first idea, I now that I see it again you're right is misleading cause it has nothing to do with "fix" ). The original column "dependency" just > stores what is given inside the tasks file. The calculated value we > need for the control file is just something else. So overriding the > original value of depends is not a good idea if we want to use the > output for verifying the correctness of our query because it hides the > dependency given inside the tasks file. > > My bad, I misunderstood the extra column status you proposed, and I overrode the dependency. So I will leave the dependency column as is from the tasks files and I may add the extra column ,like "status", using the CASE. Yes, IMHO you can start with this. > > :-) Kind regards Emmanouil
