Hello Andreas,
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Andreas Tille <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I'm not really sure. UDD is close to not documented. Perhaps it is a > good idea to ask on [email protected] using the key "[UDD]" in > the subject line. This is where UDD issues are discussed. Ok I will ask in the mailing list > I personally > started with a README file in udd/sql. Perhaps it is appropriate to > continue here. > > You mean in the udd/sql/README from the git:// git.debian.org/git/collab-qa/udd.git ? > BTW, I just commited and tested the "Section", "Enhances", etc. keys > and will implemented in production UDD in a couple of hours. wow that was fast :-) > The > stumbling stone was (as usual) totally unconnected with my change[1]. > The whole update process of tasks was broken by some change and I needed > to fix this first. Yes I checked the issue from your url, weird. On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 04:18:53PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: |> Note for my-TODO list: |> Add fields: |> Section |> Enhances |> Leaf |> Test-always-lang |> to UDD importer and Blends doc. | |Done for UDD importer, needs to be done in Blends doc. :-), I will try from now on be that responsive in my code fixes and progress So with these new fields and soon as we have the alternative packages I think we can generate the control/task-description containing the same info they contain from the current blend-gen-control. I only have one note: Sorry I forgot mention yesterday about one extra header/field because I did not find any relevant header in any Blend's tasks(or I may missed something).In the current blend-gen-control in print_task_desc() (lines 276-280) there is: for $header (keys %{$taskinfo{$task}}) { if ($header =~ m/test-.+/i) { print "$header: $taskinfo{$task}{$header}\n"; } } So it looks for a header inside a task which contains a substring matching the regex "test-.+", as I said I did not find any header like that in the task files. Which header case does this cover? Does the blend-gen-control should include it ? That's the last missing part (sorry I did not mention this yesterday with the rest extra headers), if we solve this that then we fully imitate the current blend-gen-control's functionality. Kind regards Emmanouil
