Hello Andreas, I usually have some fun with trying unusal options and thus tested > > blend-gen-control --architecture xyz ... > > which is properly handled by > > get_available_architectures(self) > > I was happy to see this test because it is flexible enough to cope with > any new arch or those we are possibly droping in the future. The only > change I would like to suggest is > > $ git diff > diff --git a/blend-gen-control b/blend-gen-control > index 1a81aa1..7e28ff0 100755 > --- a/blend-gen-control > +++ b/blend-gen-control > @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ class UDD_connector: > """ > It queries the UDD and returns a list with all the available > Debian architectures > """ > - query = "select distinct architecture from packages" > + query = "select distinct architecture from packages where > architecture != 'all'" > > self.__execute_query(query) >
Ok I made that change, thanks for your fast feedback :-) I think I got the reason of the change, I will try to use proper wording: generating a control file for 'all' architecture(as I was doing previously) it will contain only the architecture independent packages which anyway we already include them in our query: blends-gsoc/sql/blendsd. And also in our case we want to create architecture dependent metapackages and independent. right? Kind regards Emmanouil
