Hello Andreas,

On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Andreas Tille <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 11:14:16AM +0300, Emmanouil Kiagias wrote:
> > For the moment these are my todo:
> >
> > * Update blend-gen-control for handling
> > virtual-package-depends-without-real-package-depends
> > * Sum up all the missing packages problematic cases/differences from
> > {sec-}blend-gen-control output.
> >  as you told me in a previous mail:
> >  * check alternative way to create single control file
>
> OK for todo list
>
> > Once I cover the above todos what should come next( today-tomorrow and
> next
> > week)? How should we continue?
>
> I think if the above is done we could step over to really create arch
> dependant metapackages.  So bringing the source package we created using
> the tools above to a status where we can say
>
>    debuild
>
> on a certain arch and metapackages are ready.
>
>
> Ok

Another thing where I'm always concerned about is that sometimes the
> tasks files do contain versioned packages (libraries including sonames,
> other kind of versions).  One the versioned packages are upgraded people
> usually forget upgrading the tasks.  We should finally find some way to
> verify whether a package is just missing from our vision because it was
> just updated and its name has changed.
>
> Ok, this sounds very interesting :-).

Ok so as soon as I finish the todo list we are back on schedule.


Kind regards

Emmanouil

Reply via email to