Hi, Currently, apart from the main GSoC project, the tasks at hand are:
Task 1: On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 12:07:40PM +0530, Akshita Jha wrote: > As you suggested, I would like to work on the warming up task of importing > the Registration and Donation fields from debian/upstream/metadata into UDD > and injecting the rendering into the current tasks.py. It will also help me > in my actual task. > On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 5:21 PM, Andreas Tille <[email protected]> wrote: If you checkout UDD code from Git[1] you could do > ./update-and-run.sh blends-prospective > In this process the set of metadata is unpacked on > your machine and you can see by the following command: > grep -e Registration -e Donation /srv/ > udd.debian.org/mirrors/machine-readable/*/*.upstream > several upstream metadata files do just contain the Registration and > Donation information. How to proceed with the upstream metadata in your case: Probably you > need to create a new table for the metadata and probably it makes sense > to accept all keys declared at the Wiki page that defines this file[5]. > I'm a bit uncertain whether it is a good idea to keep the references in > a separate table. While I tend to say that we leave it as is and keep > only the other fields in a separate table it somehow conflicts with the > logic to have one store for one type of data. On the other hand we > have some applications that rely on the separate bibref table and this > comes quite handy. What do you think about this? > [1] ssh://git.debian.org/git/collab-qa/udd.git [5] https://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamMetadata Task 2: On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 12:44 PM, Andreas Tille <[email protected]> wrote: BTW, when looking at the code I noticed that the change I recently did > in the references definition: > https://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamMetadata?action=diff&rev2=100&rev1=99 > also needs to be implemented in the bibref importer. I also realised > that while ISSN is implemented for UDD it was lacking on the > specification page. I just fixed this with the latest change in the > Wiki. Task 3: On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 8:28 PM, Andreas Tille <[email protected]> wrote: > > BTW, since it is also related to our GSoC work: Could you perhaps make > up your mind about > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-blends/2015/04/msg00038.html > > (and my answer to this)? > > I did not found the time to check this and I think it would be a great > exercise for you to warm up with the tasks pages. Apart from the above mentioned tasks, I also need to add Upsert() to blends_prospective_gatherer.py. How do you think we should we prioritize the above tasks? -- Regards, Akshita Jha
