"Iain R. Learmonth" <[email protected]> writes: > On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 01:37:41PM +0100, Ole Streicher wrote: >> The font within the tables is smaller than the regular font. IMO this >> makes it a harder to read, and also doesn't look very aesthetically >> (just my opinion). I would try to restrict the number of fonts (and >> sizes) to a minimum. > > The tables use the same CSS class as the tables at > https://www.debian.org/ports/. I used it for consistency across the pages. > If the tables should be different, this change should be applied across the > whole website. I am happy to implement anything where there is consensus on > the debian-www mailing list, but the discussion would have to happen > there.
I asked on debian-www; let's hope that there is some response. However: In my opinion, the ports pages are also hard to read because of this small font of a large part of its content. We will see what the discussion gives here. >> All entries in the "Description" Column have the format "The goal of >> $BLEND is". This looks like an unneeded redundancy: you could just >> rename the column from "Description" to "Goal" and remove the first >> few words. > > For these descriptions, these should be useful to users as well as > developers. I'm not happy with them as they currently are. Note that these > have already been translated and any changes will create work for the > translators as they will need new translations. I would like it if there is > consistency across them, but unless I can find time, I would need someone > else to propose the changes to make. I'm not even sure the descriptions I've > put are even accurate, as they were gathered from a number of sources. I > don't know if we do a blends census but that might also be a good idea to > see what is happening with each blend. Can't we ask the blends authors for a short description for the blend (like the short descriptions we do for packages)? > If we have changes that are good and will be good for an extended time, then > I'm happy to apply them. That's why we should discuss it here, right? >> A third suggestion: Many blends have their own logo. For the overview, >> it may be nice to have the logo there as well. > > I would not want to display logos for every blend Why not? Logos are usually intuitive, and people remember them quite well. Best regards Ole
