On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 10:16 PM, Ole Streicher wrote: > Andreas Tille writes: >> I think the change of priority from extra to optional is wrong. Per >> policy packages with priority optional can not Depend / Recommend >> packages with priority extra. Since we have no way to control the >> priority of all dependencies the metapackages should remain at priority >> extra. Alternatively the every single priority of metapackages needs >> to be set explicitly. > > OK, that is a good point; I didn' think on it. I'll just revert the > Priority to extra for the moment.
IIRC the plan for optional/extra was to delete extra entirely. No idea what happened to that idea. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
