Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tuesday 29 July 2008, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
>> One solution to solve this would be to change the API of pre-pkgsel.d
>> scripts. They could have the current progress step as their
>> command-line argument and echo the standard output the new progress
>> step.
>
> Wouldn't it be better to use a fixed range for pre-pkgsel scripts and
> divide that up over the number of scripts being run? It could even be
> coded so that the more hook scripts there are, the bigger the part of the
> progress bar that's allocated to them (still leaving the majority for
> tasksel of course).
I think this way is more flexible. Even more if we add the blacklist
support I've proposed to Jeremy.
> I don't really like the idea of hook scripts determining how the main
> script works.
Could you clarify why?
--
O T A V I O S A L V A D O R
---------------------------------------------
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855
Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br
---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives
you the whole house."
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
