Samuel Thibault <samuel.thiba...@ens-lyon.org> writes:
> Samuel Thibault, le Sat 07 Mar 2009 01:21:20 +0100, a écrit :
>> Otavio Salvador, le Fri 06 Mar 2009 16:55:26 -0300, a écrit :
>> > >> Is static linking out of question?
>> > >
>> > > I would be fine to see an espeak udeb statically linking with
>> > > libportaudio and/or libasound. That could even save more disk space
>> > > than -Os builds.
>> >
>> > Could you take a look and check if it would be nice and how much space
>> > we'd use?
>>
>> I tried to statically link espeakup against libespeak, libportaudio
>> and libasound; that produced a 500KB binary, which is indeed less than
>> what espeakup + libespeak.so + libportaudio.so + libasound.so would be
>> (1.2MB). The resulting udeb is 230KB.
>>
>> There also needs to be espeak-data-udeb.udeb, which is 500KB (1.5MB
>> unpacked), and sound modules, which are 1.2MB (5MB unpacked).
>>
>> Thus a total estimation of 2MB of udebs (7MB unpacked).
>
> So, does it seem reasonable?
Yes, at least for me.
However I'd prefer to keep it in graphical installer only. What others
think?
--
O T A V I O S A L V A D O R
---------------------------------------------
E-mail: ota...@debian.org UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855
Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br
---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives
you the whole house."
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
