No longer really relevant, but just for completeness. On Wednesday 28 October 2009, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > I don't think so. A udeb can usually ignore bits about policy > that talk about packaging details. However, when it comes to stuff on > the disk that is going to outlast the installation, this is another > matter altogether: Nothing in Debian should be in violation of the FHS, > whether it is a regular package, or t is a part of the install.
That's just it: the symlink exists *only* in the D-I environment and has no influence at all on the installed system. It only exists in RAM while the installation is running. It is not part of the install. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
