tag 637111 + confirmed thanks On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 10:04 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 08:04, Robert Millan <r...@debian.org> wrote: > > 2011/9/17 Adam D. Barratt <a...@adam-barratt.org.uk>: > >> On Mon, 2011-08-08 at 14:51 +0000, Robert Millan wrote: > >>> * Move libsbuf.so.0 to /lib (needed by /sbin/zfs and /sbin/zpool). > >>> (Closes: #637100) > >>> * Move libipx.so.2 to /lib (needed by ifconfig). > >> > >> Have the portions of this change which affect the udebs been run past > >> the d-i team? > > > > They're in testing and being used for new builds already. > > > > In any case, D-I team please if you have any objection to libsbuf.so.0 > > and libipx.so.2 being in /lib, please let us know. These libraries > > are needed in /lib because zfs and zpool are linked with them, see > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=636668#55 for the bug > > report. > > No problem from our POV.
In that case, please go ahead. (Preferably sooner rather than later, as both libraries appear to be in the d-i initrd). Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1317218064.2999.12.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
