Your message dated Sat, 20 Jul 2013 12:44:51 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line dealing with old debian-installer bugs
has caused the Debian Bug report #598765,
regarding debian-installer: FTBFS on alpha: needs mirror update?
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
598765: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=598765
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: debian-installer
Version: 20100912
Severity: important
User: [email protected]
Usertags: ftbfs
Hi,
your package no longer builds on alpha:
| make[7]: `sources.list.udeb' is up to date.
| Ign copy: localudebs/ Release.gpg
| Ign
copy:/build/buildd-debian-installer_20100912-alpha-abF96C/debian-installer-20100912/build/
localudebs/ Translation-en
| Ign copy: localudebs/ Release
| Ign copy: localudebs/ Packages
| Get:1 copy: localudebs/ Packages [20B]
| Get:2 http://ftp.de.debian.org squeeze Release.gpg [835B]
| Ign http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ squeeze/main/debian-installer
Translation-en
| Get:3 http://ftp.de.debian.org squeeze Release [89.9kB]
| Get:4 http://incoming.debian.org squeeze Release.gpg [835B]
| Ign http://incoming.debian.org/debian/ squeeze/main/debian-installer
Translation-en
| Get:5 http://incoming.debian.org squeeze Release [89.9kB]
| Fetched 182kB in 0s (239kB/s)
| W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/dists/squeeze/Release
Unable to find expected entry main/debian-installer/binary-alpha/Packages in
Meta-index file (malformed Release file?)
|
| W: Failed to fetch http://incoming.debian.org/debian/dists/squeeze/Release
Unable to find expected entry main/debian-installer/binary-alpha/Packages in
Meta-index file (malformed Release file?)
|
| E: Some index files failed to download, they have been ignored, or old ones
used instead.
| Failed to update the Packages file. This usually means either of:
|
| A) sources.list.udeb does not contain a valid repository.
| You can override the generated sources.list.udeb
| with sources.list.udeb.local if you haven't done so yet.
|
| B) The repository in sources.list.udeb is not reachable.
| If you are not working online, use 'export ONLINE=n' to skip updating
| the Packages files. Beware that this can result in images with
| out-of-date packages and should be used for private development only.
| dh_testroot
| get-packages udeb
| make[8]: `sources.list.udeb' is up to date.
| Ign copy: localudebs/ Release.gpg
| Ign
copy:/build/buildd-debian-installer_20100912-alpha-abF96C/debian-installer-20100912/build/
localudebs/ Translation-en
| Ign copy: localudebs/ Release
| Ign copy: localudebs/ Packages/DiffIndex
| Ign copy: localudebs/ Packages
| Get:1 copy: localudebs/ Packages [20B]
| Hit http://ftp.de.debian.org squeeze Release.gpg
| Ign http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ squeeze/main/debian-installer
Translation-en
| Hit http://ftp.de.debian.org squeeze Release
| Hit http://incoming.debian.org squeeze Release.gpg
| Ign http://incoming.debian.org/debian/ squeeze/main/debian-installer
Translation-en
| Hit http://incoming.debian.org squeeze Release
| Fetched 20B in 0s (60B/s)
| W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/dists/squeeze/Release
Unable to find expected entry main/debian-installer/binary-alpha/Packages in
Meta-index file (malformed Release file?)
|
| W: Failed to fetch http://incoming.debian.org/debian/dists/squeeze/Release
Unable to find expected entry main/debian-installer/binary-alpha/Packages in
Meta-index file (malformed Release file?)
|
| E: Some index files failed to download, they have been ignored, or old ones
used instead.
| make[7]: *** [stamps/get_udebs-cdrom-stamp] Error 1
| make[6]: *** [_build] Error 2
| make[5]: *** [flavour_build] Error 2
| make[4]: *** [medium_build] Error 2
| make[3]: *** [subarch_build] Error 2
| make[2]: *** [all_build] Error 2
| make[1]: *** [build-images] Error 2
| make: *** [install] Error 2
| dpkg-buildpackage: error: /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules binary-arch gave
error exit status 2
| Failed to update the Packages file. This usually means either of:
|
| A) sources.list.udeb does not contain a valid repository.
| You can override the generated sources.list.udeb
| with sources.list.udeb.local if you haven't done so yet.
|
| B) The repository in sources.list.udeb is not reachable.
| If you are not working online, use 'export ONLINE=n' to skip updating
| the Packages files. Beware that this can result in images with
| out-of-date packages and should be used for private development only.
| make[2]: Leaving directory
`/build/buildd-debian-installer_20100912-alpha-abF96C/debian-installer-20100912/build'
| make[1]: Leaving directory
`/build/buildd-debian-installer_20100912-alpha-abF96C/debian-installer-20100912'
Full build logs:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=debian-installer
Sounds like alpha might have been dropped from some mirrors?
Mraw,
KiBi.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
reassign 473144 win32-loader
reassign 598653 discover
reassign 511896 partman-base
thanks
Hi,
thank you for submitting bug reports concering debian-installer, much
appreciated.
I read through all the bugs mentioned here (and I'm sure they were read by
several people at the time they were submitted) and am closing them now as/if
- they (finally) indicated success and/or
- I know from first hand experience that the functionality is working in
Wheezy and/or
- they only contained very little information and/or
- they contained user errors and/or
- they have been from a development phase where things were not stable and/or
- they are very old and/or
- they are wishlist but rather special + exotic and not have been acted on for
years. (See http://blog.liw.fi/posts/wishlist-bugs/ why it's often useful to
close wishlist bugs.)
If I've closed a bug incorrectly please do reply (it's easy to reopen and I'll
do if requested) or just file a new one - thats often better, as the bug log
will be clearer and shorter and not contain cruft.
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--- End Message ---
