Colin Watson <[email protected]> (2014-04-09): > Would it make sense to modify attr to build udebs, then change > live-installer to do a getcap/setcap run after transferring files with > tar? I think this is probably going to be simpler than adding xattr > support to busybox tar (in GNU tar that depends on a specific archive > format, so I'm guessing it's not exactly trivial). Even if we did go > for the latter approach instead, we'd probably still need at least a > libattr1-udeb.
It seems to me that attr is sufficiently small for us not to worry too much about adding udebs there and using them in d-i. Patching busybox indeed looks less straightforward, and possibly more error-prone. Mraw, KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
