Michael Gilbert wrote: > On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 9:59 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > I'm not going to go through building this on a kfreebsd porterbox to try > > and figure out how isc-dhcp would look if rebuilt against such packages, > > but that looks a saner base for porters to build upon. > > > > That doesn't make the timing issues I've mentioned disappear though. I'm > > OK with thinking about it again if porters endorse/welcome/successfully > > test the resulting packages and installation images.
I will try to find time to do this. Probably it is desirable, because it should reduce the overall size of udebs in the installer ramdisks? > Would it be ok to stage the changes in unstable to make it somewhat > easy for porters to test? I don't particularly need that as I can build the udebs and d-i image from them myself. But doing so would allow others to be testing it meanwhile, so I'm okay with it. Thanks, Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141006235202.gg25...@squeeze.pyro.eu.org
