On Tue, 2015-11-10 at 11:14 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Martin Michlmayr <[email protected]> (2015-11-09): > > * Ian Campbell <[email protected]> [2015-11-06 16:03]: > > > I've just pushed this change to flash-kenrel.git, so it will be in > > > the > > > next upload. > > > > Thanks! > > > > Can we also get this into a stable update? I believe some of the > > reports were about stable. > > (As usual: you can safely pretend I didn't follow or fully understand f-k > things.) > > Given the size of the fix and the fact the comment right above the code > being fixed is explicit about the initial intent makes me want to > cherry-pick it right away. It might be a good idea to let it go through > a bit of testing before doing so, just in case something breaks. > > What do you think?
I was thinking to at least wait for it to hit testing first (should do so at the end of the week) and then probably giving it a little more time (just a week or so) to bake there too, but I may be being too conservative. > (In the meanwhile I'll be preparing a stable branch for it and adding > this to my “next point release” todo list.) Thanks, saves me a job! Ian.
