Your message dated Wed, 11 Nov 2015 19:18:08 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#804770: debootstrap: please don't install nfacct and
related libs
has caused the Debian Bug report #804770,
regarding debootstrap: please don't install nfacct and related libs
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
804770: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=804770
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.74
Severity: wishlist
Dear debootstrap maintainers,
thanks for your work in this tool, it's just awesome :-)
Yesterday I noticed that debootstrap is installing nfacct and related libs
by default.
I simply ignore how do deboostrap chooses which packages to install.
nfacct is a software by the Netfilter project to perform network accouting
by means of iptables.
It has a very specific pourpose, and I think it's not used unless you are
running an accounting firewall or other network application to perform
accounting. Which I bet is very rare.
I guess that 100% of users of nfacct are fine if they have to manually install
it with aptitude or other method after running debootstrap.
I was told on a debian channel (IRC) that there is no reason to not install
it, it's a very small package after all.
But again, the nfacct software has very specific pourpose and little usage for
most of people both in the desktop land and the server land.
I wonder if nfacct being installed by debootstrap is the reason behind the
abnormal popcon values [0].
thanks, best regards.
[0] https://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=nfacct
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Arturo Borrero Gonzalez <[email protected]> (2015-11-11):
> On 11 November 2015 at 15:25, Cyril Brulebois <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Arturo, given the issue is fixed in unstable and testing already, are
> > you fine with letting jessie in its current state? It looks to me that
> > this is only a small annoyance, people can still remove this package if
> > they want to spare a few kBs. I'm also not sure this warrants an update
> > in stable (we tend to only fix serious or important bugs there).
> >
>
> I'm fine, yeah. Thanks for your time :-)
>
> Feel free to close the bug or whatever.
Great, doing so then.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
