Source: debian-installer Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS [vagrant@ in x-d-cc]
Hi, d-i now FTBFSes on armhf, due to: ,---[ hd-media ]--- | gen-hd-image: Installing /usr/lib/u-boot/firefly-rk3288/u-boot-spl.rksd at sector 64 ... | gen-hd-image: Installing /usr/lib/u-boot/firefly-rk3288/u-boot.img at sector 256 ... | config/armhf//hd-media.cfg:33: recipe for target 'hd-media_images_concatenateable' failed | make[2]: *** [hd-media_images_concatenateable] Error 1 `--- ,---[ netboot ]--- | gen-hd-image: Installing /usr/lib/u-boot/firefly-rk3288/u-boot-spl.rksd at sector 64 ... | gen-hd-image: Installing /usr/lib/u-boot/firefly-rk3288/u-boot.img at sector 256 ... | config/armhf//netboot.cfg:40: recipe for target 'netboot_images_concatenateable' failed | make[2]: *** [netboot_images_concatenateable] Error 1 `--- ,---[ u-boot ]--- | Providing u-boot binaries for Firefly-RK3288 ... | cp: cannot stat '/usr/lib/u-boot/firefly-rk3288/u-boot.img': No such file or directory | config/armhf//u-boot.cfg:8: recipe for target 'u-boot-binaries' failed `--- I suppose this is due to this change in u-boot on 2017-08-01: | u-boot (2017.07+dfsg1-2) unstable; urgency=medium | . | * u-boot-rockchip: | - Ship u-boot.bin in firefly-rk3288 instead of u-boot.img. | - Add NEWS file explaining the change for firefly-rk3288. See https://tracker.debian.org/news/860117 It'd be nice if someone could double check what new path is needed, and push a commit to master after a test build. Otherwise I'll do so in a couple of days. Thanks already! KiBi.
