Hi Ansgar, Ansgar <[email protected]> (2019-01-24): > On Wed, 2018-11-28 at 08:49 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > > we want to have libnss-systemd installed by default if systemd is the > > active PID 1, while still retaining the option to uninstall the package. > > > > For that, the systemd-sysv package gained a Recommends: libnss-systemd [1] > > > > Unfortunatly, Recommends are not considered during the initial bootstrap > > installation, so newly installed systems will not have libnss-systemd. > > > > We were in a similar situation for libpam-systemd. The approach we took > > back then was to bump the pio to standard. This seems to have worked out > > ok, so I'd like to ask that the same be done with libnss-systemd. > > > > [1] > > https://salsa.debian.org/systemd-team/systemd/commit/577df340cad51d5779d646d9aefa28c3c1b90d4c > > [2] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=803184 > > Asking -boot@ for an ack.
It's been a while since I last had to think about priorities, so I might be missing something; but the proposed change doesn't seem unreasonable to me. (Also, both packages seem to be available for the same set of archs, so that shouldn't be an issue for ports?) Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois ([email protected]) <https://debamax.com/> D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
