On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 at 14:15:27 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Simon McVittie, le mar. 17 nov. 2020 11:11:53 +0000, a ecrit: > > So I think losing libgdk_pixbuf_xlib-2.0.so.0 from the > > udeb would be OK. > > I had a run on the amd64 .udebs, and could not find a binary whose ldd > output contains "libgdk_pixbuf_xlib-2.0".
Great, thanks! Then I'll go ahead as planned, and not consider d-i to
be a blocker for this.
smcv
