El 2022-05-15 a las 08:27 +0200, Holger Wansing escribió: > Hi, > > Am 14. Mai 2022 22:04:26 MESZ schrieb "Camaleón" <noela...@gmail.com>: > >El 2022-05-14 a las 20:42 +0200, Holger Wansing escribió: > >> The main problem is: why does > >> https://www.debian.org/international/l10n/po-debconf/es > >> not list the already existing (and partly translated) po file for Catalan? > >> I don't know... > > > >Well, Catalan and Spanish are different languages, thus «ca» locale > >files are listed under its own site: > > Hrrrr, sorry, it was of course complete nonsense me talking > about Catalan here. > I mixed them up, because I pushed a translation for ca before > writing that mail.
I should have guessed something like that, sorry O:-) > Correct would have been: > > Why does https://www.debian.org/international/l10n/po-debconf/es > not list the already existing (and partly translated) po file for Spanish? I dunno, but I prefer that way. Let the original traslator takes care of the file. In fact, I rejected translating PO files from Debian Installation Manual and stick to Debconf templates to not collide with other translation members to avoid problems (see my comment #28¹ in Bug #969381). > Or moreover, that site should not list installer packages separately > at all... > The page build process does not cover such special cases though. Now I have been warned the site mixes PO files from several sources, I will first check the origin of PO file before translating. Thanks for noticing! ¹https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=969381#28 Cheers! -- Camaleón
