Your message dated Mon, 22 May 2023 02:24:32 +0100 with message-id <20230522012432.gw5...@tack.einval.com> and subject line Re: Bug#1036371: debian-installer: Blu-ray double-level iso is too large to burn to DLBD disk has caused the Debian Bug report #1036371, regarding debian-installer: Blu-ray double-level iso is too large to burn to DLBD disk to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1036371: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036371 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: debian-installer Version: 20210731+deb11u8 Severity: important Tags: d-i X-Debbugs-Cc: budheal...@gmail.com Dear Maintainer, * What led up to the situation? Since the DLBD .iso install neither sets up sources.list with a mirror to download from nor requests more disks to complete the set, a test of the DLBD install when using actual Blu-ray disks were in order. * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)? RC3, packaged at 61-62GB per volume, can not be burned into DLBD media. * What was the outcome of this action? The test could not even be started. * What outcome did you expect instead? The DLBD volumes should be configured at 48-48.5GB. At 61GB, apt still asks for new packages in /media/cdrom, which cannot possible be satisfied. See bug#1035476 - editing sources.list as a workaround is, as apt reminds each time, insecure. All the packages d-i needs fit in the 25GB set, if not the 16GB one. Then, the following volumes allow someone with a slow connection (like mine) to complete an installation from media - if the volumes fit on the media. Otherwise, the rest of the volumes are not easy to use as a complete download of the distribution. -- System Information: Debian Release: (inserted) 12 RC3 --
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---OK, no worries. Closing this bug then... On Sun, May 21, 2023 at 05:56:03PM -0400, Bud Heal wrote: >My apologies. I built the DLBD .iso files and then moved them by USB because I >was curious why occasionally more files keep being downloaded when I the files >to scan already include them. >The files I was talking about are the 2023-05-15 build, and I must have munged >them by putting them on USB sticks, In the always-check-again department, over >and out. > >On Sun, May 21, 2023 at 2:54 AM Steve McIntyre <st...@einval.com> wrote: > > Hi Bud, > > On Sat, May 20, 2023 at 02:54:00AM -0400, Bud Heal wrote: > >Package: debian-installer > >Version: 20210731+deb11u8 > >Severity: important > >Tags: d-i > >X-Debbugs-Cc: budheal...@gmail.com > > > >Dear Maintainer, > > > > * What led up to the situation? > >Since the DLBD .iso install neither sets up sources.list with a mirror to > >download from nor requests more disks to complete the set, a test of the > >DLBD install when using actual Blu-ray disks were in order. > > * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or > > ineffective)? > >RC3, packaged at 61-62GB per volume, can not be burned into DLBD media. > > Just looking at the files on the server, those numbers surprise me... > > debian-bookworm-DI-rc3-amd64-DLBD-1.jigdo:# Image size 48415279104 bytes > debian-bookworm-DI-rc3-amd64-DLBD-2.jigdo:# Image size 44362018816 bytes > > Could you show exactly what size your images are coming out as, please? > > -- > Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. > st...@einval.com > "I've only once written 'SQL is my bitch' in a comment. But that code > is in use on a military site..." -- Simon Booth > > -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. st...@einval.com Welcome my son, welcome to the machine.
--- End Message ---
