On Sun, Jul 09, 2023 at 12:15:35AM +0300, ValdikSS wrote: > On 09.07.2023 00:02, Steve McIntyre wrote: > > Nothing should be caring about C/H/S at all in the 21st century. Using > > C/H/S only allows you to access 515MB of disk . *Everything* these > > days uses LBA instead. > > > > What makes you think that the BIOS on this old machine cares about > > C/H/S? > > My machine is old, it's a 32-bit CPU from 2006 in a machine from 2008.
That's sad. My 486 from 1993 uses LBA correctly and doesn't care about CHS at all. How could a machine from 15 years later when disks much much bigger than CHS supported possibly care at all? -- Len Sorensen