Your message dated Mon, 13 Dec 2004 02:15:28 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#285382: more kernels on the netinst CD
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Dec 2004 22:56:55 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 12 14:56:55 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gpm.stappers.nl [213.84.119.166]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Cdce7-0002Bv-00; Sun, 12 Dec 2004 14:56:55 -0800
Received: by gpm.stappers.nl (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 0EB3C794A0; Sun, 12 Dec 2004 23:54:28 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 23:54:28 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: more kernels on the netinst CD
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="kfjH4zxOES6UT95V"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Geert Stappers)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--kfjH4zxOES6UT95V
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: debian-installer
Severity: wishlist
> > > > A 386 kernel was installed, but the system is a Pentium 4,
> > > > so a 686 kernel is expected ....
> > >
> > > This is ridiculous. _You_ should know why a 386 kernel is installed
> > > with a netinst installation. I'm not even going to explain it to you.
> > > If, you can't figure it out, ask.
> >
> > well, _I_ can't figure it out, so I'll ask: why ? Is it a known bug ?
> > (Why/how) is it related to netinst ?
> >
> > Also, it works fine here: I got a k6, which I installed via pxe and
> > netboot. And it had kernel-image-2.4.27-1-k6 installed automagically.
>=20
> On the net_inst_ CD image only the 386 variants of the kernel are include=
d=20
> so, as they are the only ones available to the installation system, they=
=20
> are the ones that will be installed (either the 2.4.27 version or the=20
> 2.6.8 version).
>=20
> As you used net_boot_, all kernel variants in the internet archives are=
=20
> available, so the correct one for your hardware will be picked.
I do agree with "with one kernel we can do a install",
but I don't see the limitation on the netinst CD.
Please put more kernels on that CD ROM.
Cheers
Geert Stappers
--kfjH4zxOES6UT95V
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBvMwjOSINbgwa/7sRAswFAJ9r9mmKRIu5j33sjrw+GaGaVlyQZQCgmuFe
ZqhaTh/HrR5FrILE7Qvpc8s=
=OrEp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--kfjH4zxOES6UT95V--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 285382-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Dec 2004 01:16:31 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 12 17:16:31 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 195-240-184-66-mx.xdsl.tiscali.nl (elrond.fjphome.nl)
[195.240.184.66]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CdepD-00031u-00; Sun, 12 Dec 2004 17:16:31 -0800
Received: from strider.fjphome.nl ([10.19.66.86] ident=fjp)
by elrond.fjphome.nl with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1CdeoD-0003Rc-00; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 02:15:29 +0100
From: Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Geert Stappers),
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#285382: more kernels on the netinst CD
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 02:15:28 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
On Sunday 12 December 2004 23:54, Geert Stappers wrote:
> I do agree with "with one kernel we can do a install",
> but I don't see the limitation on the netinst CD.
>
> Please put more kernels on that CD ROM.
There are more than one reason to keep the size of the netinst CD limited
to about 100 MB.
This wish is not going to be implemented.
Use a full CD if you want kernel selection.
P.S. Joe Random User in Bulgaria, Kenia, or even
Little-Hamlet-On-The-Heath does _not_ have broadband even if you do.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
