On Sun, Dec 19, 2004 at 04:13:41PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > On Thursday 16 December 2004 16:06, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > > I was thinking of changes that are relevant for Sarge as well. > > > Everybody agrees that the manual for Sarge is far from optimal. > > > > But then these changes should happen in the sarge branch, too. Or you > > have to create a sarge-webpages branch if you want to protect the > > version used in the images from too many changes. > > Of course. The question was just: do we want to republish on the web when > changes in the Sarge branch are made (doesn't have to be for every little > dotted i or crossed t of course).
Definetly yes. > > If someone would make a list which packages/versions of packages the > > installmanual needs that aren't available in woody, this would be > > appreciated. > [...] > In the end I was able to build all formats by using some intermediate > files build using Sarge. Thanks for the work. I have to say, the backport solution doesn't look very feasible to me... Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
