Your message dated Thu, 13 Jan 2005 11:38:27 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line partman: 'Two file systems are assigned...' message misses 
value
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Jun 2004 08:57:43 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 27 01:57:43 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from orochi.topstudio.co.jp (mail.topstudio.co.jp) [202.224.239.193] 
(postfix)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1BeVTr-0005Wx-00; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 01:57:43 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by mail.topstudio.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED92E222F7D
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 17:57:41 +0900 (JST)
Received: from mail.topstudio.co.jp ([127.0.0.1])
        by localhost (hydra [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
        id 07232-04 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
        Sun, 27 Jun 2004 17:57:41 +0900 (JST)
Received: from hellhound (orochi.topstudio.co.jp [202.224.239.193])
        by mail.topstudio.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDD5A222F1F
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 17:57:41 +0900 (JST)
Received: by hellhound (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 173582140D0; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 17:57:41 +0900 (JST)
From: Kenshi Muto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: partman: 'Two file systems are assigned...' message misses value
X-Debbugs-CC: Kenshi Muto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.6 (Marutamachi) APEL/10.6 MULE 
XEmacs/21.4 (patch 15) (Security Through Obscurity) (i386-debian-linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 17:57:41 +0900 (JST)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p7 (Debian) at topstudio.co.jp
X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  using "From" header
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
        X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: partman
Severity: normal
Version: 40

(with partman-target 23.)

I found a small problem in error message:
> Two file systems are assigned the same mount point (/): SCSI1 (0,0,0),
> partition #sda1 () and SCSI1 (0,1,0), partition #sdb1 ().

A. # means number, so this should be 'partition #1' isn't this?
B. message misses value for ().

   partman has 'msgid "SCSI%s (%s,%s,%s), partition #%s (%s)"'.

   partman-target has 'msgid "Two file systems are assigned the same
   mount point (${MOUNTPOINT}): ${PART1} and ${PART2}."' and 'db_subst
   partman-target/same_mountpoint PART1 $(humandev $oldfs); db_subst
   partman-target/same_mountpoint PART2 $(humandev $fs)' in
   finish.d/proper_mountpoints.

I didn't check on dual IDE or mixture of IDE/SCSI, but maybe same
problem will occur.

Thanks,
-- 
Kenshi Muto
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 256466-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jan 2005 02:38:30 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 12 18:38:30 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from orochi.topstudio.co.jp (mail.topstudio.co.jp) [202.224.239.193] 
(postfix)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1CousY-0004FF-00; Wed, 12 Jan 2005 18:38:30 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by mail.topstudio.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AF65223539
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 13 Jan 2005 11:38:28 +0900 (JST)
Received: from mail.topstudio.co.jp ([127.0.0.1])
        by localhost (hydra [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
        id 19520-04 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
        Thu, 13 Jan 2005 11:38:28 +0900 (JST)
Received: from cyclopus.topstudio-unet.ocn.ne.jp.topstudio.co.jp 
(cyclopus.topstudio-unet.ocn.ne.jp [192.168.1.3])
        by mail.topstudio.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED58B223537
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 13 Jan 2005 11:38:27 +0900 (JST)
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 11:38:27 +0900
From: Kenshi Muto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: partman: 'Two file systems are assigned...' message misses value
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.11.30 (Wonderwall) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.6 
(Marutamachi) APEL/10.6 MULE XEmacs/21.4 (patch 15) (Security Through 
Obscurity) (amd64-debian-linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p7 (Debian) at topstudio.co.jp
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

This problem looks be solved.
I close this by myself.

Thanks,
-- 
Kenshi Muto
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Reply via email to