On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 04:13:17PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > > Update for current status, 10 days after my first mail: > > m68k > No abiname; not updated. ? > > [This is another arch that I'd consider releasing d-i rc3 without > it being updated for the kernel security fixes.]
> So s390 and hppa are the main potential rc3 blockers, while alpha and > sparc just need to get kernels into testing and arm, m68k, and powerpc > (2.4) need to get a move on if you want them updated for the rc3 > release. We're fast approaching the point where the kernel updates are > the only significant thing blocking the rc3 release. > > Note that besides the abiname changes, there are pending uploads for > both 2.4 and 2.6, for all arches, to fix numerous other security holes. > I'm not considering those above, since it should be much easier to roll > a fix for a "normal" kernel security hole into d-i than the it is for > these security fixes that involve ABI changes. I uploaded new 2.6.8 kernel-images for m68k a week ago, but I did not make it urgent...: Too young, only 7 of 10 days old For 2.4.27 I am waiting for the latest kernel-source to be released before I build new images. This is supposed to happen today/tomorrow? I should be able to get those images ready over the weekend then, and I'll try to remember to make it more urgent... I have no idea about the abichanges, m68k uses no abiname? Is that a problem? Is there anything else m68k has to do, like build new d-i-k-i-m68k packages? Anything else I am missing? Christian
