On Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 08:01:54PM +0000, Alastair McKinstry wrote: > You are receiving this mail because you maintain a package that depends > on libnewt0.51.
> This has now moved to 0.52 in upstream, and the versioned symbols patch > from Debian was applied > with the 0.52 tag, requiring that all packages depending on libnewt0.51 > be rebuilt > to depend on libnewt0.52 instead. > It would be appreciated if you could rebuild your package accordingly. > Maintainers with packages depending on libnewt0.51, according to whodepends: > John Lines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (plptools) > Alastair McKinstry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (libnewt-dev libnewt0.52 > newt-tcl python-newt whiptail) > Debian Install System Team <[email protected]> (cdebconf) > Andree Leidenfrost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (mindi-partimagehack mondo) > Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (partimage partimage-server) > Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (lokkit) > Noèl Köthe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (kudzu) > Marek Habersack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (pike7.2-pexts-newt > pike7.4-pexts-newt pike7.6-pexts-newt) > Debian QA Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (libnewt-perl) > Debian VoIP Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > (asterisk-bristuff asterisk-classic zaptel) With the exception of gnome-lokkit (previous binNMU using the old ".0.1" version numbering scheme), all of these packages should be binNMUable for the transition. I've just scheduled binNMUs across all architectures on the autobuilders for them, so no maintainer action should be required except for Chris. :) Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
