On Tuesday 16 May 2006 09:59, Eddy Petrişor wrote: > I have addressed the concerns regading this point since the > minimeeting held some time ago[1] by proposing a solution that would > not interfere with the present packages.
See the reply by the Gnome maintainer for why this is not an option.
pgpUptCHnsqCh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
