* David Härdeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-20 11:09]:
> o Using lvs/pvs/vgs instead of vgdisplay + grep
> 
>       The former have an output which is optimized for script parsing
>       which the latter doesn't. I've verified that lvs/pvs/vgs are present
>       in the sarge lvm2 packages. As for lvm1 support, I can't verify 
>       that it is supported by vgs/lvs/pvs. [1] seems to suggest that 
>       it is in fact supported (see the first example).

Quite honestly, I'd just drop lvm1 support anyway.

> o partman-lvm and lvmcfg split
> 
>       Later it might make sense to merge lvmcfg into partman-lvm. tbm 
>       hinted on IRC that arch's without partman usually have no need 
>       for lvm either. Is partman not working on all archs? Does it 
>       matter?

Yeah, partman doesn't work on a number of architectures, e.g. SGI MIPS
machines.  However, I doubt it matters a lot if LVM is available for
them or not.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  • lvmcfg changes David Härdeman
    • Re: lvmcfg changes Martin Michlmayr

Reply via email to