Your message dated Thu, 19 Oct 2006 23:05:07 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line A couple Broadcom NetXtreme II (bnx2) mappings
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: discover-data
Version: 2.2006.10.12-1
Tags: patch
These nics are found in some newer model ProLiants servers/blades.
--- pci.lst.orig 2006-10-12 12:18:39.000000000 -0600
+++ pci.lst 2006-10-18 16:31:34.000000000 -0600
@@ -5749,7 +5749,7 @@
14e41648 ethernet tg3 NetXtreme BCM5704 Gigabit
Ethernet
14e41649 ethernet tg3 NetXtreme BCM5704S_2 Gigabit
Ethernet
14e4164a ethernet unknown NetXtreme II BCM5706 Gigabit
Ethernet
- 14e4164c ethernet unknown NetXtreme II BCM5708 Gigabit
Ethernet
+ 14e4164c ethernet bnx2 NetXtreme II BCM5708 Gigabit
Ethernet
14e4164d ethernet tg3 NetXtreme BCM5702FE Gigabit
Ethernet
14e41653 ethernet tg3 NetXtreme BCM5705 Gigabit
Ethernet
14e41654 ethernet tg3 NetXtreme BCM5705_2 Gigabit
Ethernet
@@ -5783,7 +5783,7 @@
14e416a7 ethernet tg3 NetXtreme BCM5703X Gigabit
Ethernet
14e416a8 ethernet tg3 NetXtreme BCM5704S Gigabit
Ethernet
14e416aa ethernet unknown NetXtreme II BCM5706S Gigabit
Ethernet
- 14e416ac unknown unknown NetXtreme II BCM5708S Gigabit Ethernet
+ 14e416ac ethernet bnx2 NetXtreme II BCM5708S Gigabit
Ethernet
14e416c6 ethernet tg3 NetXtreme BCM5702A3 Gigabit
Ethernet
14e416c7 ethernet tg3 NetXtreme BCM5703 Gigabit
Ethernet
14e416dd ethernet unknown NetLink BCM5781 Gigabit
Ethernet PCI Express
--
dann frazier | HP Open Source and Linux Organization
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2006.10.12-1
[Dann Frazier]
> Ok, I wasn't aware of the distinction. I maintain a version of sarge's
> d-i where I backport fixes necessary for HP machines, and I
> try to make sure my changes are submitted back to the appropriate sid
> packages when necessary. I don't actually use the sid version of
> discover for anything, so I didn't realize this was a non-issue.
Ah, right. Good to hear. I was starting to worry if the -26.lts
files didn't work. Closing it as done.
Friendly,
--
Petter Reinholdtsen
--- End Message ---
