Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 08:34:02AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > - the kernel modules in a separate archive, of which there would be one
>> > by
>> > kernel version (upstream+abi), so as to keep d-i images alive even when
>> > new kernel versions are pushed in the archive. Further separation into
>> > flavours may help low memory systems on arches with a lot of flavours.
>>
>> The biggest problem here is that will looks like we'll support all
>> those combinations regarting security and also bug fixing and this
>> won't be true... that can be used if it stay just as a sid resource...
>
> Since the problem of moving versions only appears during the development phase
> of a release, not once it is released, this is indeed no problem at all.
>
> Please go ahead and try to do a beta3 netboot install right now, it will have
> trouble since we can't have 2.6.15 or whatever it was, and 2.6.17 kernel
> modules in the archive at the same time. Not easily anyway.
Yes. I know it'll fail.
I see the problem you're trying to address ... I just not sure if it's
the right way to solve it.
--
O T A V I O S A L V A D O R
---------------------------------------------
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855
Home Page: http://www.freedom.ind.br/otavio
---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft gives you Windows ... Linux gives
you the whole house."
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
