On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 02:25:37PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote: > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 10:01:20AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > >> On Tuesday 07 November 2006 18:07, Sven Luther wrote: > >> > I remember (but am not anymore 100% sure, so a reply from frans/joeyh > >> > would be nice), that frans told me last week or so, that an upload of > >> > parted was ok with regard to d-i RC1, since parted is not in the image, > >> > and not migrated to testing, but i would like confirmation on this, and > >> > also advice from the debian-release folk, thus posting here. > >> > >> No objection to an upload to unstable if it does not change the ABI. If it > >> does change the ABI it needs more coordination. > > > > This is what i remember from two weeks ago when i thought i fixed the > > proble, > > but it was actually another problem. > > > >> The new version is too late for RC1 though, but can of course be tested > >> using daily images. > > > > Fine with me, but them going in asap after RC1 would be nice. I wonder if > > they > > also break x86 RAID installs, since Bastian said he encountered the bug on > > x86 > > and s390, but since nobody complained about this ... > > I think it should go to sid with urgency=medium so we can test it and > move it asap. Since there's no ABI change, there's no problem moving > it etch asap.
Well, parted is frozen, so urgency stuff is pointless anyway, right ? Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
