On Sat, December 9, 2006 19:23, Frans Pop said: > On Saturday 09 December 2006 18:05, David Härdeman wrote: >> + # NOTE: Only commented out because we might want to reenable this >> post-Etch > > Hmmm. That seems contradictory: either p-c is ready or it is not.
I wanted to keep the lines for two reasons: 1) To make it easier to change it back, e.g. if Max did not agree with the change (I'm not sure what happens to translations if I remove the template entirely?) 2) Post-Etch we might want to add some new functionality which requires a certain amount of testing before I'd feel safe letting users rely on them. Crypto-key-using-usb-key comes to mind. > If it is not ready, then the message should not be disabled (and maybe we > should rethink if we want to include it in the release). > > If it is ready, the message should be totally removed and p-c should be > treated like any other d-i component from that point forwards. > I don't really see that individual changes after Etch would warrant > re-enabling the message for the component as a whole. Hmm...sure, I can remove it completely > Personally I feel it is ready. I agree -- David Härdeman -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
