Op 30-12-2006 om 14:15 schreef Frans Pop: > > Maintaining a status on the wiki is only useful if it is actively > maintained by someone who (1) knows when the status changes and (2) can > accurately describe the status. > My personal opinion is that maintaining a status on the wiki is redundant, > and thus I'm not willing to maintain it. > > Why do you persist in adding it and putting something fairly random there? > I've now deleted it twice. Do I really have to do so again?
Frankly, my dear, I can live with the "state is outdated" signals. And see a challange in preventing recieving those signals. But more serious: > My personal opinion is that maintaining a status on the wiki is redundant, Redundant to what? What is the other place where state is maintained? Cheers Geert Stappers -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
