Hi, On Wed, 2007-09-05 at 19:27:17 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Is that really true? If bin-nmus, which require finding and prodding one > > of a small set of very busy people, are more maintenence cost than > > managing one more udeb, we're doing something wrong. > > > > It certianly can be true if the library is used by lots of packages and > > tends to be involved in complex testing transitions. (Agurably that's > > because there's something wrong, like like too-tight library deps that > > cause such transitions.) I don't see any reason why libaio1-udeb would > > be harder to manage than other simple udebs though. The reverse > > dependencies of libaio are very small.
> Guillem, the Joey's above comment[1] made clear that would be better to > have the udeb then the effort of coordinating bin-nmu and like in case > of an security update or so. Right, and I agree. > 1. Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at debian-boot > > So please add it on your next upload. Cool, I've done that, the package should be now in the NEW queue. thanks, guillem -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
