Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thursday 24 January 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> Wouldn't be better to change the binaries names? It would follow other
>> architecture specific modules that doesn't include the archname on the
>> binary name package.
>
> I see no reason to override the decision of Bastian to use those names.
> Especially for netdevice it could be argued that the package name would be
> too generic without the s390- prefix.
Well, personally I have no objection about having it or not.
I agree about netdevice, indeed.
--
O T A V I O S A L V A D O R
---------------------------------------------
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855
Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br
---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives
you the whole house."
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
