On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 04:48:54PM -0400, Mark W. Eichin wrote:
> Yeah, this list serves mostly to keep the flaming off of -devel :-)
> Apparently the idea itself will cause the end of civilization as we
> know it, or something.  (We also get flames from the BSD side, about
> causing yet-another-split...)


        Hmm, oh yeah, the ``there're already too many versions''
        camp.  But the 3 Net|Free|OpenBSD are already extremely
        similar...  


> 
> However, the archives should have a pointer to at least one attempt to
> start down one of the 6 paths [part of the problem is that "Debian
> BSD" can describe a whole spectrum of interesting but distinct
> things:
>       bsd kernel, linux emul, debian-linux userspace on top.
>       bsd kernel, glibc port, rebuild (but not rewrite) packages.
>       bsd kernel, bsd libc, port linux packages
>       bsd kernel, bsd libc, debian-packages of the *BSD* user space.
> There is of course significant variation in what goals lead to what
> choices; also, they're not completely inconsistent, you can have a
> system that includes enough of the first and fourth branches to be
> interesting both sets of people...]
> 
> I'm still interested, and in fact may end up doing it as part of a
> high quality network service product (debian packaging, BSD kernel -
> if nothing else, it'll confuse the hell out of the script kiddies :-)


        One gentleman in FreeBSD-land has created a Sys-5//Linuxesque
        system admin package.  He gave up after digging several
        flaming arrows from his chest.  I was all for this take-the-
        best-of-both FreeNixes admin approaches.  But... . 

        When/If you ever create your hybrid I'd shore be interested in
        putting it on my spare server.  Currently I've got 3 boxes:
        2 FBSD, 1 SuSE Linux.  Also, I'd use your DebianBSD for when
        I go native|naked--DSL.  

        (FWIW: DaemonNews.org is interested in this project.  I've 
         been writing for the zine since it began and would like to
         write articles on this New and Improved BSD.)

        gary


> 
> My original interest was to get something useful on my collection of
> Sun 3 hardware, since at the time, bsd on a sun 3 "just worked"
> whereas linux still need another few rounds of making the MMU work at
> all.  I may get back to that once I do the business version...
> 
>                       _Mark_ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>                       The Herd of Kittens
>                       Debian Package Maintainer
> 
> 
> --  
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

-- 
   Gary D. Kline         [EMAIL PROTECTED]          Public service Unix


Reply via email to