On Mon, 02 Jul 2001 17:31:18 -0700 Will Yardley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> it seems to me that these are two different things since bsd isn't a > hardware type; it's a kernel and operating system. so it seems to me > that 'debian-bsd' should be something different from 'debian-sparc' or > 'debian-alpha' since it's not using a linux kernel. > > seems like it would be make more sense to use stuff that is already part > of *bsd where possible (UFS, libc, bsd utilities) but take a debian > approach to development and packaging etc. There is not argument here, using ext2 would be plain stupid, and it's already decided that we're not porting glibc.
