Nathan Hawkins wrote: > Agreed except for s/NetBSD/FreeBSD/g in my case. NetBSD has nothing I'm > really interested in, while FreeBSD does. > > It might be reasonable to just work on both, and see what happens. I expect > that any work done on one would probably be at least somewhat helpful to the > other.
Well, while I don't see any issue with expanding it to all of them, the vote was fairly weighted in favor of NetBSD. So I'd say perhaps we should say that NetBSD is the initial port target, with the other BSDs to follow. -- *************************************************************************** Joel Baker System Administrator - lightbearer.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lightbearer.com/~lucifer
