I couldn't get gcc 3.0 to build. As for aims: this isn't exactly going to get released with woody, or very likely with the next one. I'm going with anything that I can get to work for right now.
On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 04:53:44PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 12:51:17AM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > > Great. I'll prod this at some point over the weekend and try to get NetBSD > > ones built. Have you done anything about differences between the FreeBSD > > and Debian file layouts? > > I've built binutils packages, and have managed to get gcc to build but > haven't packaged it as yet. Currently no versions of gcc will build on a > netbsdelf system without patching, but patches are available. Should we > aim for gcc 3.0 or stick with 2.95? (the patches are pretty much > applicable to either, it's just a couple of mods to the configure scripts > and some changes to the arch specific include files for the most part) > > -- > Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
