> What do people think? Using 2.95 wherever possible might have the > advantage of being easier given that patches already exist, but I can't > really see them appearing in upstream. Trying to fix the gcc 3 development > tree would probably be more rewarding in the long-term (we don't have to > bombard the Debian maintainer with as many random patches), which gives me > an excuse to become significantly more intimately acquainted with the gcc > tree than I currently am :)
I say the main thing is that it gets the job done for now. If fixing up 3.x means that the world will become a better place, great! If, however, fixing up 3.x means that Debian/BSD is going to get stuck in a rut and not move forward, well, let's just stick to 2.95 until we get some more momentum. IMHO, of course. I think it would be really useful if one of you chaps who have a preliminary Debian-NetBSD environment could provide a dump sometime soon so that the rest of us who are too lazy to do the whole thing from scratch can start getting some work done. :) What's the last word on Web/CVS/FTP/whateverspace? Anyone? - Michael ===== -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GCS/MU d- s+:+ a--- C++ ULISBH+++ P+++ L++(-) E- W--(+) N o? K? w--- !O !M V?> PS+++ !PE Y+ PGP- t+(-) 5 X R+>+++ tv-- b++ DI(+) D G e->+++ h r-- y ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Buy the perfect holiday gifts at Yahoo! Shopping. http://shopping.yahoo.com
