On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 12:55:52AM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote: > Matthew, if you had not violated the GPL by distributing binaries > without complete corresponding source code, Richard would probably > have been in a much better position. Consider your wrist slapped.
Indeed. My apologies for this - the source that I have is currently being tarred up. I'm currently including the binaries in there since some of my modifications were to the build-tree rather than the source, with the consequence that if I do any sort of make clean some may get blown away. I'll try to clean up these during the week. > In fact, if you are unable to produce a `proper' Debian source > package, then I think the GPL requires you to do as he suggests. > Furthermore, in the early stages of a porting project access to other > peoples' build trees can be very useful, and I'd recommend uploading > them if you can even if you can also produce a proper source archive. I'll upload the tarred build trees to http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~mjg59/debian-netbsd/source once they've finished compressing. It's likely to take a while for them all to appear due to the speed of my uplink. -- Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
