-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 matthew green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> perhaps initially netbsd libc - it seems to me to be much more likely > to work 100% (or close to) with the kernel. after a lot of testing > you might want glibc for default (but i'd always hope otherwise :) What about the -current libc, where the kernel uses some sort of signal trampoline? Will glibc have that? My question is, why are you wanting to use glibc at all? What does it do that the stock NetBSD libc doesn't do, other than have GNU all over it? - --Michael -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (NetBSD) Comment: See http://www.flame.org/~explorer/pgp for my keys iD8DBQE9PeV7l6Nz7kJWYWYRAg4GAJ9ipNfJMIMb7h+acrGkldcbFyKkzQCfUV/z h7C7oD4iwVxWPLu9ZW9Bbxs= =JM2/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
