>>>>> "Michael" == Michael Ritzert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Michael> Why is it important for debian BSD to sum up the
Michael> differences in BSD libc and glibc?
Maybe to justify choosing one or another ?
Michael> - the dominance of glibc-based linux has forced IBM and
Michael> SUN to supply linux programming interfaces. This might
Michael> happen in the BSD world in the future.
What's the significance of this ?
Michael> - for the debian/BSD project on the sparc it seems to be
Michael> better to stick to BSD libc (we keep in track with alpha
Michael> and intel ports)
How come ?
Michael> So, coming back to the main topic: how did the
Michael> NetBSD/intel people overcome these difficulties caused by
Michael> bsd libc/glibc?
Why would NetBSD/intel people care at all about glibc ? What
difficulties they have ?
~velco
